At a recent speaking engagement in Austin Texas, Senator John
Kerry responded to a question about WTC Building 7 by concluding that according
to his information, the building was brought down as a result of a controlled
demolition, directly contradicting the official line that the structure fell as
a result of fire and debris damage.
WTC Building 7 was a 47-story building in the WTC complex that
collapsed at 5:20pm on September 11. The building had been
structurally
reinforced and was not hit by a plane yet collapsed in a uniform implosion
within its own footprint in a matter of seconds after sustaining relatively
light debris and fire damage following the collapse of the twin towers.
News networks like BBC and CNN were
reporting that the building had collapsed before it fell , indicating that
the media were being handed a script of events that had yet to even unfold.
Ground zero EMT’s, firefighters and police were all told hours in advance to
clear a collapse zone for Building 7 as it was going to be “brought down.”
Questioned on WTC 7 by members of Austin 9/11 Truth Now at a
Book People event in Austin Texas, Kerry responded, “I do know that that wall, I
remember, was in danger and I think they made the decision based on the danger
that it had in destroying other things, that they did it in a controlled
fashion.”
Kerry is basically saying that the building was intentionally
demolished to prevent a random collapse from damaging nearby buildings, but that
premise has never been explicitly admitted, with officials clinging to the
notion that the collapse was expected but was not aided by means of explosive
charges, because to admit to a controlled demolition would be to expose
foreknowledge of 9/11 itself.
Whether Kerry is basing his response on inside knowledge or
hearsay is largely irrelevant, the fact that a sitting United States Senator is
openly contradicting the official 9/11 story as well as a multi-billion dollar
insurance lawsuit strikes at the root of the controversy surrounding Building 7.
In February of 2002 Silverstein Properties
won
$861 million from Industrial Risk Insurers to rebuild on the site of WTC 7.
Silverstein Properties’ estimated investment in WTC 7 was $386 million. This
building’s collapse alone resulted in a payout of nearly $500 million, based on
the contention that it was an accidental event caused by the fall of the twin
towers.
EMT’s, firefighters and first responders all knew the building
was pulled, anyone with an ounce of common sense can watch the videos and
understand that building’s don’t commit suicide - and yet Silverstein, the
government, and their propaganda arm Popular Mechanics, are wedded to the myth
that the structure fell as a result of fire damage. They are beholden to this
explanation because any revision on their behalf would undermine the entire
sequence of events on 9/11 and call into question other aspects of the official
story.
Their credibility rests on sweeping the issue of WTC 7 under the
rug, which makes it our responsibility to keep beating the Building 7 drum.
Official reports from both NIST and FEMA state that they cannot
explain why Building 7 fell, but maintain that it was related to a terrorist
attack on the complex on 9/11. However, the
FEMA report concludes
that, “The specifics of the fires in WTC 7 and how they caused the building
to collapse remain unknown at this time. The best hypothesis has only a low
probability of occurrence. Further research, investigation, and analyses are
needed to resolve this issue.”
NIST is
currently undertaking a study of WTC 7 to determine if bombs or incendiary
devices were used to bring down the building.
Controlled demolitions expert Danny Jowenko was shown footage
and building schematics of Building 7 by Dutch television and
immediately concluded that its collapse was a result of deliberately placed
explosives .
Preparing to demolish even a moderate sized building takes weeks
of preparation. A building as large as WTC 7, a 47-story skyscraper, must have
taken at least as long. Therefore, the idea that the building was demolished in
response to fires spread from the twin towers is not a satisfactory response, as
the building could not have been set up for unexpected demolition in only a few
hours, much less while fires burned inside. All personnel were withdrawn from
the area very early, meaning the explosives which can clearly be seen in the
videos were placed days or weeks before 9/11.
Kerry was also asked about the research of Dr. Steven Jones, who
has tested both samples of steel from the twin towers as well as recovered dust,
which have both tested positive for the chemical signature of Thermate, which is
used to cut support beams in localized reactions during a controlled demolition.
Kerry stated that he was not aware of the research and is “open to hearing
anything based in fact and evidence.”
Since John Kerry is a fellow Skull and Bones member with President Bush,
allied to the fact that he took a dive despite massive evidence of vote fraud
during the 2004 election, we won’t hold our breath on the possibility of Kerry
being a torch bearer for a new investigation into 9/11, but his conclusion that
WTC 7 was deliberately demolished adds substantial weight to a 9/11 enigma that
officials are terrified will reach critical mass.
Random Posts
Stumble it!
Why the confusion? Larry Silverstein stated unequivocably on video that He and the NYC fire chief consciously decided to , and in fact did, “pull” (that means demolish) the building. This is a fact which is not in question, as a quick web search will confirm. Now I do not claim to know if he was telling the truth, or whether the preparation of that demolition was even possible in the few hours available after the attacks (I have my doubts). But the demolition is an undeniable fact in light of the physical evidence and the leaseholder’s own recorded, public statement. Why is this still a subject for debate???
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #It’s a subject for debate because, as stated, it’s impossible to prepare the demolition of a building in hours, that’s why. Which means….. it was prepared a long way in advance. Which means ……….. 9/11 was pre-empted.
SM.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #It is still a subject of debate because the Bush Administration and the 911 “Truth” Commission continue to deny that WTC 7 was purposely destroyed, a planned demolition, which, as you say,a long with many others, is an undeniable fact. As others who have posted on the net explain, Bush & Company can only insist on the “facts” as presented as the “official” theory, because to do otherwise would open up a pandora’s box with unpredictable consequences. If WTC 7 was a planned demo ,as you state, based on evidence and expert testimony and now, you also inform us, that Silerstein states he decided to “pull the plug” on the building that day, this fact alters the entire “official” theory. There is no way that that building could have been purposely demolished that day. Fires raging in the building. More importantly, there was not enough time available to carry out such a plan. Think about it for just a minute; there is the plan, the equipment, then the personel needed to accomplish such a feat. What’s important here is not what Siverstein or Kerry state; the hell with them, I have my own eyes and have watched in fall numerous times. As they say, you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure it out. It right there in the video. It was not hit and it fell straight down. Come on! The important question, the only question is, why does Bush and company continue to insist on the official theory? Why? Why? Why? If 7 was controlled, who planned it? When? Why? Who authorized it? Who knew about it? What was the purpose of the cover up? Who benifitted from the cover up? Where was the media in all this? Why was so much evidence and eye witness testimony supressed? Why were those who have doubted the official theory shamed, ridiculed and presented as “conspiracy” crazies? And on and on. When the American public learns the truth of 911, whatever that may be (it is not the “official” version), a hell is going to break lose in a way that is totally unpredictable.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #theres been so much cover up under the world traid center storries; it makes sence to believe what senitor Kerry says Its going to take about 6 democratic presidents to brang this country back to where it was before G.W.B; MESSED IT UP; HENRY W. BAGBY.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Clearly, (US gov’t,Bush Administartion) can’t fool the skeptics. Inside my mind there are questions: is this a part of greater conspiracy? I mean part of something that related to the end of time? The fight between good & evil? Surely Bush & Company cannot be the good guys. As long as they lie about 911 they won’t be. the problem is: who will be the good guys?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #You are all very sad lonely people.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #All this article proves is that John Kerry is as deep(or shallow) a thinker as Rosie O’Donnel. As indicated by some others, the building could not have been rigged in the allocated time. Why continue the outrageous conspiracy theories? Try thinking deeper and more logically than John and Rosie.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #It’s Kinda sad that we all have become so partisan that we fail to use our own common sence to dicepher facts from fiction and exercise what’s so enviable by the rest of the world…….An Americans given right to ask WHY and HOW ?
There is a massive on going fraud with the 911 event,could have been premeditated,planned, deliberate or just opportunistic,but if we fail to ask, the truth, like that of JFK, would never be known. This is massive, the so called US free press was in on it and refuses to speak up..common folks use your heads
My conspiracy theory, is that the Saudi’s are pimping the world. They are the real names behind this bold economic strategy. With Hussein out of the way for no reason (Please spare the arguement .There are worse leaders out there whom the US love and condone). Very soon they would be interpreting a new Koran to the Iraqi’s and a reason ffor their priced Ho (the US govt) to get over there.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #There has been a study done recently. This is about people who believe in conspiracy theories. The evidence shows that these people are emotionally deficient or have been mentally stunted in their development. Yes, I do believe a great majority of the people are that way. You have no further to look than our intellectual morons teaching our kids in the colleges and universities. These never-grew-up hippies are still living emotionally, mentally and socially in the 60’s due to their lack of maturing.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To “John Gault,” Yes I read the book. three times. You sir, are an idiot to suggest we the people need to get a life. I would guess you hide out in front of your computer and love GW as much as you love yourself and your idiot comments. Of course the building was pulled. Open your eyes. You on Gw’s payroll by chance?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Why not speak with the persons or company that “pulled the building” somebody is out that either rigged the building that day or days or weeks earlier. Where are those people? This shouldn’t be that hard, there cannot be many people/companies that could bring down a building so expertly.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To say that 911 happened as the government and the media said it did says that you are a sheep. Open your eyes, we are allowing our “elected officials” manipulate the truth and play games with American lives for money. The truth will come out one day and when it does there will be hell to pay. God help us all.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #I love conspiracy theorists. Bottom line is this: 2 people can keep a secret if one of them are dead. If this were truly a conspiracy, based on the fact that Building 7 was demolished, then the secret would be near impossible to keep in today’s age, and there would be more evidence than hearsay, hints and innuendo, and comments by so-called ‘experts’ looking at a video.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Think about this: What, anyway, is gained by demolishing Building 7 in this case? Other than fodder for conspiracy theories…
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #All of your speculation and guessing proves nothing.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #This is not a question of being on Bush’s payroll or being sheep. It’s about making sure there are sufficient indisputable facts to back up your opinions. So instead of writing insulting posts and throwing out wild speculation. Go find some real facts since obviously the media isn’t uncovering what you need. Trust me it will make your rants more believable and carry more weight.
What’s stupid is all this speculation based on comments in the media. Where’s the facts that support these speculations? The only fact is that the building was pulled. How do we get from there to the certainty that 9/11 was “pre-empted”? Do we know that it’s totally not possible for certain or not likely but probable? has someone verified that? This may be more of a case of a bumbling cover up so that the public wouldn’t get worked up to the point where they saw a conspiracy where there is none, which apparently failed miserably.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Vald, why are you so quick to blame the Saudies; it seems to me that Silverstien is a jewish name. He has said that it was his decision to “pull the building”. That means to me that he was at the least in on the conspiracy. Are you saying that he is working with Saudies? And what part would you have the Bush administration playing, or do you think that all this could happened without any involvment by our own government ?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #I think that you need to take a long look at all of the facts before drawing any conclusions. As for me, I think that it is entirely possible that any powerful persons who are deeply invested in the oil indurtry could have played a part in it. This is why we need a credible investigation into this matter.
All of the above is a sad commentary about life in America - the fact that 911 happened, the fact that we can’t be sure our own government wasn’t behind the attack, the fact that we started a war based on incomplete intelligence, the fact that elected officials assume office under the cloud of voter fraud, the fact our media reports their opinions rather than just the facts…and the list goes on and on.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Aren’t there any politicians with integrity?
I meant to add:
Do we know what’s the probabilty that the building couldn’t have been pulled that quickly? Under normal circumstances that may be the case but 9/11 was certainly not normal. No one is asking (and should be), could it have been possible that day under a given set of conditions? And did those conditions exist on that tragic day?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Here’s another thing for you all to contemplate. If you want another reason to scratch your head, go to Youtube and type “911-pentagon” in the search window. Watch the video of the object that hits the pentagon; it is clearly NOT an airliner. So, if you can explain how an airliner can crash without leaving a damaged airplane behind I would like to hear it,,, no I wouldn’t …I think I have been lied to enough.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Forget conspiracy. Remember physics. How do the buildings collapse? How fast does the failure move? WTC 1 & 2 collapse from top to bottom. WTC 7 from bottom to top. In all 3 cases, the failure front moves at about free fall speed, accelerating at 32 ft/sec squared.
Now, imagine in some way hoisting an entire steel reinforced floor to the height of 110 stories or 47 stories, and then dropping the thing to an open field below. Ignore the obvious wind resistance for such an object for now. At impact, it is likely that a good deal of the concrete conglomerate is broken free of the steel reinforcement and what you’re left with is the steel grid enclosing huge chunks of concrete block.
What do we see in WTC 7’s collapse? The building, more or less intact at floors above ground level, begins to fall straight down into its footprint. The roof comes down at the acceleration of gravity, meaning that there is no structural support below it at any point in its fall. At the contact point with the ground, each floor is effectively turned to dust, meaning that each individual vertical support beam must be, in some way, disposed of so as not to slow the fall of the structure remaining above. In this manner, the whole building falls into itself, with each floor being “eaten up” as it reaches ground level.
Even if the entire vertical support structure on the original first floor had been taken out, then the upper 46 floors comes down intact. Pulverization doesn’t just “walk up” to the top floors.
Back to WTC 1 & 2. In each of these two towers, it seems that the failure is initiated by the upper block of floors above the impact points effectively breaking free and starting to topple down. Certainly, there is a huge mass in roughly 20 to 30 floors of these two buildings. However, in each case, well before the massive catastrophic failure starts down the buildings below the impact points, the upper floors apparently blow to dust in front of our eyes. Here is the essence of the problem: this dust will not exert a downward force on the building structure below. Hell, it’s blowing back up and out. How does the 100th floor exert force on the 70th floor if it’s been powdered and is blowing away in the breeze? In each case, we see a wave run down all four faces of the building in which the floors above are turned to powder and the structural steel is ejected up and out. Furthermore, the rate at which this wave front runs down the building is accelerating at the speed of gravity, but the powdered building above is not falling. It is largely standing where it was, as the outer structural steel walls are forced outward and, note this, upward. The force vectors are all wrong here. The energy and momentum flows are all wrong. The rate of collapse is all wrong.
Granted, WTC 7 looks more like a classic controlled demolition. They are almost always planned to go top to bottom. Sometimes, the plan is to force the building over sideways into some adjacent open space. Since WTC 7 had suffered no direct airplane strike, but only and apparently falling debris hitting one side of the structure, one might almost have expected it to fall backwards into its supposedly compromised side. That is, of course, not what happened as the video clearly shows: virtually free-fall collapse down into its own base.
Do this the Sherlock Holmes way: when you eliminate the impossible, what you have left, no matter how implausible, must be the truth.
As to conspiracy theories, the following has been said before. Every theory in this case involves conspiracy. More than one person is involved in every explanation. The official story involves a conspiracy of no one but al Qaeda operatives. Some stories say that al Qaeda flew the planes, but that others assisted by rigging the buildings. Some stories have that there were no commercial jet liners at all. And so it goes… I am sure that many folk like the official story just because it is shelter from the storm of emotion that is set loose if you deny its plausibility. Like wondering if there were 3 or 4 shooters in Dealey Plaza instead of one in the book depository.
But right now, don’t go poking fun at conspiracy theories. The official story is a conspiracy theory itself. It says that 19 guys did it with airplanes. The problem is that the exit wound is bigger than the entrance wound by about 1000 times.
As to whether speculation proves anything, hmmm. I agree, but if it wasn’t just airplanes, then one needs some more conspirators, right? Someone not on an airplane that bright September morning.
Who?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #If one concedes to these theorists that WTC 7 was in fact brought down intentionally, then by their own “facts” they present as evidence, that it would be impossible to rig a 47 story building in the amount of time from the first attack to the time WTC 7 came down and given the manpower needed to accomplish such a feet one must conclude it had to have been rigged days or weeks in advance. How then can they explain this was all done in the “city that never sleeps” without anyone suspecting anything until the building came down? The drilling and the strategically placing of munitions and the coming and going of over 200 people (which I understand from a demolitions experts comments is the manpower required for such a demolition of this size) was completely undetected. And to the point of jimb we are to believe that considering all the people involved from the engineers to the suppliers right down to the workers have kept silent! Never in the history of man has a greater secret been kept then. And for the record I know several firefighters and the term “pull” in fact is a signal to pull the men out. It is no longer fight-able and lives are in danger. I’m all in favor of asking questions but it seems until these theorists get the answers they want they will continue to raise these ridiculous conspiracy theories. To those conspiracy theorists out there, ask yourself are you looking for an answer or seeking confirmation to the probability of these factually baseless theories.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #My only question regarding all this is if this was all done in advance how could you possibly set all these explosive devices without anyone in the building being aware of it? Workers,manitenance,security, etc., they must have been blind and or drunk for the several weeks leading up to this event. How could you possibly keep all the people going in and out of this building in the dark? Certainly somebody would have seen something. Especially with the heightened security from the previous World Trade Center blast in the nineties. To suggest that someone set these devices in a controlled manner without anyones notice seems a bit far fetched.
I’m all ears.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #There is no doubt , the entire World Trade Center event was the work of elements within The United States Government. There are floating agents that report to outside authorities. One day they would be FBI the next day CIA or NSA or even ATF. No all are involved; But enough to destroy this country.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #The central banks of the world have way too much power
Follow the money and you will find the answers
Jess,
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #It was said in one of the many videos I have watched on this subject, by one of the hundreds of experts that have given voice to this matter, ( if you wanted to look it up you could probably find the interview on Youtube, that’s where I saw it) that the buildings were closed down for days befor 911 for “security checks” . It seems to me that the investigation should start with who would have the athority to close the WTO for “security” checks and go from there. I’m sure whoever it was, it wasn’t anyone from another country.
oops,,,I ment WTC
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #It all seem to come down to who profits. The oil industry sure, but at 9 trillion dollar it seems the arms suppliers are doing pretty well. With Communist Russia no longer around to use as an excuse for an arms race. Hmmm well lets invent one .
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #How about terrorists. Perfect, as you fight them you create more enemys. Now we need lot more weapons. The never ending battle what more can you ask ?
the odd thing in all this is -
if the building was pulled as Silverstone says, why doesn’t the company who pulled the building just come out and say so, and then tell us how long it took them to set the explosives ?
its doubtful to me, very doubtful .. that a decision to pull a buliding, could and would be made on the same day as the intiial tragedy, causing even more mahem, distress and dust, and that it could all be organised and accomplished, withing a few hours, given the panic, trauma and dislocation at the time .. but if this is the case .. why doesnt the company who did the work, just come forward and put up their hand ??
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Randolph,
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #All very true, and I suspect that if one were to investigate further , he or she would find that all of these groups of people who stand to profit are connected in some way, or are in fact the same people. The Carlisle(sp?) Group comes to mind, with which, it seems to me I have heard it said, the Bush family is connected . One more reason for the American people to insist on an unbiased investigation.
Normally I would jump on the conspiracy bandwagon, but there’s plenty of you here already, so I’ll play devil’s advocate.
It seems one likely explanation is that the conspiracy involving WTC7 is one of Insurance Fraud. One explanation could be that the building was already prepped for demolition, but then 9-11 occured and the owners suddenly would rather claim this as a loss to insurance than what it really was, a scheduled demolition, which I doubt would have paid off very well. Now, the real question is “would the NYFD be an accomplice to insurance fraud?” If this scenario was the case, they (fire dept.) would have to know that the building was prepped for demolition in advance.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Ann,
I was not aware of these video statements. I’ll certainly google them. I do however find it hard to believe they closed WTC 1 &2 for several days for security checks. There were 30,000 people on any given day who worked in each building, Seems strange they could close their businesses for several days. Even if the buildings were closed providing opportunity to rig WTC 7 that still leaves the fact that several hundred people had to keep their mouths quiet.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #The whole affair stinks to high heaven all over the world.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #2+2 equals four and anyone who believes the official story is either insane, stupid, or brainwashed.
What a convenient building to destroy some how some way.
Even John Kerry is afraid of the truth because the people who are responsibe for all of this are dangerous , very very dangerous. They are capable of cold blooded murder and I’m not talking about Bin Laden
yea right oh I forgot to tell you the sky is falling
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #wake up people (you conspiracy theoriists blow my mind )
Grr,
You make a good point. And I am enclined to concede the probability of the building’s holding group to be opportunistic and profit from the insurance settlement which as you point out would be quit large. What is difficult to believe is that the FDNY would be party to such a fraudulant act especially in the wake of loosing several of their own. Sure it is concievable even beleivable to bribe some of the ranking officials within the department and demolition companies but what of your common firefighter or hourly employee setting the explosives. Surely someone would have on their own come forward to blow the whistle.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Nicholas,
I’m all for a lively debate but when you resort to name calling such as “stupid” and “insane” your statment looses much credability.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #What’s interesting to me is how easy it is for some to swallow that a U.S. President is capable of sacrificing 3,000-5,000 innocent civilian men, women and children just so he could declare war. I suppose our government perpetrated the attacks on Pearl Harbor so we could enter the war.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Since everybody else is having so much fun hypothesizing: The reason no one who did the work for the demolition “company” is coming forward is because they were in the buildings when they collapsed. Of course, the workers didn’t know that that was they day someone would be pushing the button on the work they had already done. Of course, they could have been on the planes. As someone said earlier, “2 [or more] people can keep a secret if one of them are dead.†Therefore only way you keep a secret would be to terminate all those who knew it. Those doing the terminating don’t have to be told why the real reason (or any reason) for following their orders, so eventually there is really only a handful of people (with too much too lose) who actually know the truth.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To “Kevin”: As jess told you above, “pulling the building” is removing all the firefighters, police and other personnel known to be in the building because the situation is deemed to be unsafe and uncontrollable. It is not pullimng the building down or whatever it is construed to be by the conspiracy theorists.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #There is a lot of difference between blindly following the government’s line and actually assessing whether the government’s line appears plausible. The people on the 9/11 commission were not dummies or bought off by the government. Those people were highly intelligent people of both parties who were knowledgeable in the ways to inquire into situations and evaluate the information received. Their conclusions were likely as close as we can get to the truth until one of you traces down the people who were able to clandestinely plant all the explosives in the buildings without anyone beung able to catch on to what was happening.
Ok I take back stupid and insane but leave brainwash , naive, gullible.
Also I believe :
A) Those who deny this horror have a political and or religious
interest / agenda in doing so
B) I also believe the government abides by that old saying ” there’s a sucker born every minute” and have adopted all the tools of propaganda, misinformation, disinformation for the purpose of advancing numerous business interests.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #If you want to know about 9/11, then go to “The Power Hour” on your computer and order the film: “9/11 In Plane Site”. This will show you much that contradicts the official report - much like the Warren Commission with JFK’s assassination. We have been lied to. Wake up America! Turn off the television and start researching “new world order”/conspiracy.” Some of it is phony, wacky stuff. Some good websites are newswithviews.com; fromthewilderness.com; freepressinternational.com. I say again: WAKE UP AMERICA! TURN OFF YOUR TVs AND START PARTICIPATING IN YOUR FREEDOM…OR IT WILL BE TAKEN…IF IT’S NOT TOO LATE ALREADY. ALSO, SEARCH THE “CONSTITUTION PARTY.” IT’S THE 3RD LARGEST PARTY IN THE COUNTY. WHY HAVEN’T YOU HEARD OF IT? GEE, I WONDER…MAYBE FOR THE SAME REASON THAT YOU DON’T REALLY KNOW ABOUT 9//11.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To Grrr,
The NYFD had NOTHING to do with this, this was just a lie on Silverstein’s part. A fire department has neither the training nor the expertise needed to design and engineer the perfect fall we all witnessed, let alone access to the tools and equipment needed, and the tons of explosives needed to bring down a building of that size. As shown on the Discovery Channel numerous times, the entire collapse is precisely timed and executed through a computer running a very sophisticated program. The only people who would have access to that program and the Thermite that was found, are people who are in the business, such as demolition experts or Army Corps of Engineers. Besides all of the expertise, tools, and explosives needed for this job, the other necessity was time. The time could have easily been provided for, as G.W. Bush’s brother Marvin Bush, was in charge of security for the entire WTC complex.
Since Silverstein admitted the building was demolished live on T.V., all the people who were working there the weeks before the demolition have a real nice basis for a law suite, considering that they were occupying a building that was unsafe, and should have been condemned, from the moment the demolition crew started cutting the girders and laying the explosive charges weeks before the fall.
Do you remember the speech G.W. gave shortly after the collapse, advising us NOT to pay attention to the conspiracy theories that were going to emerge? How did he know?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #PaulB_30
So that’s it!!!??? anyone who knew too much was killed in the collapse? How can that be possible? If they had been rigging WTC 7 for several days or weeks how would those conspirators get them all together in WTC 7 on 9/11 to “KILL” them off to shut them up? WOW!
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #What was in building 7 that was so important?
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #EVIDENCE of an ongoing investigation into drug money being
laundered through wall street on a global scale as well as tons of evidence on ENNRON.
Mike Ruppert “911 Truth and Lies” He looks at this all like it should be like an investigation “facts” No emotion no BS.
Look it up watch one of his seminars at colleges across the country. Everything he says is sourced out and can be verified.
One thing to Consider……The governement if it is involved NEED’s us to be afraid, so that we will buy in to their story, and go along with the war.
They also want the rest of the world to be afraid of the US government. So they give us (the US Citizens)the “official story” and they secretly begin the conspiracy theories so the rest of the world believes we did it to ourselves. Because let’s face it how powerfull is the USA really if 19 idiots can cause all this mayhem.
So they get us fired up to start the war, while the rest of the world fears a government that is crazy enough to kill its own citizens. Then we turn on each other as the smoke begins to clear and we begin to understand what really happened. The blind attack the people who are beginning to see, because they are afraid to accept the fact that the US government IS CORRUPTED, and is capable of such a horrible act.
So while we fumble about pointing fingers and calling each other names, they continue to plunder whomever and wherever they like. Meanwhile the US citizens are gridlocked and unable to effect a real investigation to oust the perpitrators. Add in the fact the mainstream media doesn’t seem to care…they are more interested in whether Britney and Paris are wearing underwear or not. And that Rudolph Gulianni whisked all the evidence away before it could be tested…..
The list goes on…..
Finally I would like you to ask yourself this. If you are opposed to new investigation into building 7, to find out exactly why it failed, what are you afraid of??
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #If the official story is correct and towers 1 and 2 collapsed due to the plane crashes and resulting fires, why did 7 collapse? It was not hit by a plane, had minimal damage and yet it fell, which has NEVER happened before. Wouldn’t you at least like to know why? So that new building construction can benefit from the gained knowledge and be built safer. Are all of our existing skyscrapers at risk of collapsing from small issolated, unattended fires? Why does No One seem concerned with this amazing set of circumstances… I for one don’t get it!
Simple, the job was highly compartmentalized and each work team was led to believe that there was still work needing to be done. They went into the building thinking it was going to be just another work day on this project. (Hey, if this isn’t what really happened, it sure would make a good movie script.)
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Here is another thing to consider…..Is it possible that after the bombing of 1993 that they rigged the buildings for controlled collapse in the event anopther attack threatened to cause a partial collape or a collapse that would cause them to fall on their side and cause much more damage and loss of life from surrounding buildings.
So the buildings are rigged to come down in to their footprint if needed. Then on 9/11 the decision is made by someone that they should be brought straight down rather than risk the chance of them falling over.
You can still argue that someone out there would have known about it but don’t forget that our intelligence community is trained to keep everything they do a secret even from us. And i am sure the FBI CIA FEMA NSA etc. would have people to do this job without involving a private company.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #What makes anyone think that people who were involved in this affair are stupid enough to open their mouths ? .
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Does anyone believe that a plane hit the Pentagon?
I’m not a liberal . I’m not a Democrat and I don’t like what happened and I don’t like to have the wool pulled over my eyes by people who have vested interests in this dirty affair.
Many have profited from this bloodshed and I donìt like it.
Sorry but welcome to the real world which is not just roses and pie in the sky.
I never realized until today how corrupt our country truly is. Perhaps we should all denounce our citizenship and opt for a much less corrupt country, one which will allow us freedom of speach one where we can practice the religion of our choice. hmmm if only such a place existed…I understand Iran is beautiful this time of year!
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #People people this all nothing more than theory and hypothesise! Where is the “PROOF”? anyone can argue “what about this?” or “That” . “isn’t that possible”? Sure anything is possible but what most of these theories lack is evidence, facts and proof! Talk about pie in the sky thinking. I’m not swallowing the “company” line hook line and sinker but show some proof!
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To Jess. “Watch 9/11 In Plane Site.” You can order it from “www.thepowerhour.com”. You will see PROOF of lies and coverup. From the Pentagon shot in the above mentioned film (the same shot in the official 9/11 Commission Report) there is a computer visible on one floor, an open book without the pages being singed. Logic tells us that if a plane’s fuel could take down WTC buildings (which it didn’t), then certainly it should have melted a computer and burned a book. Get the official report (9/11 Commission) from your public library and check it out. Get the film above. It’s non-partisan.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Give me the proof of why there is a war in Iraq.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #All you smart alecks should lose an arm in Iraq then ask for proof.
Some people have been around and know a snow job when they see one and I’m one of them.
Naturally if you make money in the stock market then let’s blow up a few more buildings but don’ t send people to do the dirty work and die in the desert.
The Pentagon is highly responsible and intertwined in this whole sordid affair.
Jess, I know you were being ironic, but even with all of its problems, this country is a good as it gets (not that there isn’t plenty of oportunity for improvement).
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Sorry. Me again. Also, read Micheal Ruppert’s “Crossing the Rubicon”. You can order it from http://www.fromthewilderness.com“. Ruppert was a narcotics cop in LA. This book will convince you of wrong-doings at the highest levels of government.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #“Pull” the building means to evacuate the firefighters…it means to demolish in demolition terms…fire chiefs aren’t demolitionists…
…and I see idiots quoting and mentioning the conspiracy videos on the internet…simple searches can give you all the info on how they are false and only made for attention or money
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #To Cathy. Yes! There are politicians with integrity: Ron Paul, Tom Tancredo. Also, anyone in the Constitution Party - the third largest party in America.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Tom V,
I’ll certainly view 9/11 in plane site, already have the 9/11 Commission. You and anyone else interested may want to check out this site: debunking911.com/pull.htm it gives a very comprehensive explanation on why WTC 7 collapsed on itself. Also check out ejectejecteject.com in it there is a link to a video of a fighter jet impacting a wall at 500 miles per hour. upon impact the plane literally disintegrated. It was a test conducted by the U.S. to determine the damage a plane may have on a nuclear facility. FYI it was conducted pre 9/11
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #As for performing the setup without people taking notice, I seem to remember at the time being informed (I think it was one of those Discovery Channel shows on the science of the collapse) that the entire complex (both towers at least , maybe bldg. 7 as well?) underwent a “refurbishing” of the insulation around the support beams in the year or so prior to the event. I never connected it before, but what if that new insulation (supposedly installed to prevent the very thing that the official story now says happened) was really something else? Modern day explosives can be made to appear to be just about any material or consistency these days. Hmmmmm.
24 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #Of course a year prior to 9/11, Bill Clinton was President and the election of 2000 had not occurred yet. So either Bush is far more intelligent than he is given credit or Bill Clinton must of planned it.
25 Apr 07 at 9:59 p #