Leaked confidential NIST documents concerning the investigation into the collapse of WTC 7, the 47-storey skyscraper that was not hit by a plane but imploded in under seven seconds on 9/11, reveal that an "unusual" event preceded the collapse of the building - a "jet of flames" that shot out of several windows after most of the fire had already died down.
The leaked documents precede a BBC hit piece documentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete collapse from fire damage alone — a scientific impossibility.
The documents - entitled Confidential and Predecisonal Document NIST Report on Building 7 - form the preamble for a long-awaited final verdict on what caused a structurally reinforced building to fall like a controlled demolition despite suffering relatively minimal fire damage.
Chapter 1: WTC 7 Visual Evidence, Damage Estimates, and Timeline Analysis (William Pitts) is a thorough analysis of window fires by video and picture evidence, which concludes that all major fires before floors 7 and 13 died out prior to collapse.
The report states, "At 4:38 p.m. all of the windows between 13-44A and 13-47C were open, and the fires responsible for opening the windows had died down to the point where they could no longer be observed."
"Just prior to the collapse of the building at 5:20:52 p.m. a jet of flames was pushed from windows in the same area. The event that caused this unusual behavior has not been identified."
The report describes the nature of fires from floors 7-13 and also states, "With the exception of the fires on the 19th, 22nd, 29th, and 30th floors discussed at the start of this section, there is essentially no direct visual evidence of fires on other floors of WTC 7."
The photographs displayed in the report, many of which have never been seen before, do not show any other damage to the building than the small fires from floors 7-13 and the relatively minimal "scoop" observed on the lower right-hand west face of the building.
What could have caused this "jet of flames" to shoot out of windows immediately prior to the collapse of the building? The decompression force of a series of explosives or an incendiary device?
The leaked documents precede a BBC hit piece documentary which airs on July 6th and is set to claim that WTC 7 was the first steel-framed building in history to suffer a complete collapse from fire damage alone - a scientific impossibility.
As we reported on Monday, Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, New York City Housing Authority Barry Jennings, who was trapped inside Building 7, reported explosions going off and witnessing dead bodies before the collapse of either of the twin towers.
We will be combing through the lengthy NIST documents over the course of the next few days to pick out more irregularities and potential smoking guns over the next few days - stay tuned. Feel free to e mail us with any interesting discoveries of your own.
Click here for copy files of NIST documents.
Related Posts
Stumble it!
Posted by ans.
Filed under 911, Article, What’s Really Going On?
Posted on Wed, 25 June 2008 at 9:59 p
Subscribe to RSS 2.0 feed.
Here is my take on what really occured–Bush/Cheney could not have planned and exacuted the bombings of Sept 11/01. Nancy Pelosie knows full well that Clinton Regime had funded the whole affair since 1996 and why no impeachment. Bush is no dummy–Blackmail–If I hang so well the Clinton gang.
05 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #Here is what happened–Clinton funded the Bunker concrete busting Bombs early on to a Israel firm.The bomb had to be low radiation and small. WTC1 WTC2 had been wired up with hundreds of these nuke bombs.The reason WTC7 went down different was that it was a last minute Demo Job. Enron FBI Court files were in WTC7, which connected Bush,Chenny.
That 2.3 Trillion dollars missing after 911 was the pay-off to Israel and zionk hacks and Media–well job done.
Lots of truth movement coverage of the pre-set demolition charges.
05 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #Lots of coverage of the steel being removed immediately.
Not much on how setting up this immediate removal to foreign countries would have had to be arranged far in advance of 9/11 (just as with the pre-set charges). The logistics (reserving ships, advising receiving nations) would have been too complex to be accomplished in a period of less than 2 weeks.
Why does the BBC insist on making bloody non-credible fools of themselves with this stuff?
Now I wonder if those flames had anything to do with the 80,000 gallons of diesel fuel stored in No7, by none other than Rudolph Guiliani.
05 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #Betcha that didn’t make the news huh?
There’s only one important question concerning the attacks, did the US gov’t allow/participate in 9/11?
The answer to that query would explain the illegal wire-taps, suspension of habeas corpus, banning of books like “America Deceived” from Amazon, detaining of dissenters in fences miles away from events, and multiple wars based on lies.
How can the gov’t be innocent in 9/11 when we have caught it lying so many times (WACO, Ruby Ridge, no WMDs, USS Liberty, Operation Northwoods, Gulf of Tonkin, Pearl Harbor, ETC.)?
In law, if you determine a person lies ONCE during his testimony, it can be assumed that he lied in the remainder of his testimony. How come we do not hold the gov’t to the same standard as it holds us to?
The gov’t lied to us about Iraq and more Americans have died there than in 9/11. If the gov’t lied about Iraq then why is everyone so reluctant to believe that the gov’t lied about 9/11?
Final link (before Google Books bends to pressure and drops the title):
06 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0
It’s obvious that explosives took down the building, and they had to have been pre-planted, just like in the two main towers. There was no demolition crew in the area on 9/11, and it’s certain that nobody in either the NYCFD or NYCPD had the know-how to bring it down.
It’s quite amazing to me that to this day, not one whore in the Zionist-controlled “mainstream” media has ever asked Silverstein how he managed to have a steel-framed building taken down in a matter of minutes, and that nobody in his insurance company, or in government at any level, has ever charged him with insurance fraud, destruction of government property, or criminal conspiracy, just for starters.
Of course, the government has no problems with any of it, since probably millions of files on active cases dealing with organized crime, drug-running and money laundering, with demonstrable links to U.S. intelligence, were destroyed when the building went down.
06 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #The strangest scenario is the realization of truth by the masses. But also the reality that all the real power is not in the masses hands.
07 Jul 08 at 9:59 p #No one wants to be a martyr. And while 1,000’s or millions of people might be allied and dependent on the NeoCons, they also had no foreknowledge of the event.
Those in power (who did not know) are now concerned with damage limitation. With a feeling that some idiots amongst them made some idiotic mistakes. But they are not prepared to challenge the whole NeoCon way. Which is a shame.
What with the internet All the truth is going to come out, that is most likely.
There will probably be a call for Martial law. And we can look at when Mao died or when Yeltsin stood on a tank as analagous events, when a whole nation teeters on going this way or that.
Let’s hope there will not be any ‘Kent States’.