Two persons identifying themselves as New York police officers
interrupted a 9/11 Truth demonstration on a public sidewalk in front of the new
WTC 7 Building to intimidate free speech, stating “Larry [Silverstein] doesn’t
want to hear it,” before accusing
We
Are Change founder Luke Rudkowski of having a bomb and that
his cell phone was “a gun.”
The officer was apparently responding to refusals to stop
filming their faces as police attempted to impede free speech on behalf of Larry
Silverstein, making slanderous and knowingly false accusations including:
“I think he’s got a bomb in his bag. Saw wires coming out. Think
he’s got a bomb in there.”
The police officer carried on during the encounter, saying “A
terrorist act– I guess they go away for about 30 days.”
Rudkowski tells him he is not a terrorist and that he is an
American citizen. The officer responds, “You’re right.
But by the time the government figures it out, you’ll be in the hole for 30 days.”
The officer made the statements on camera with a notable smirk,
and made no attempt to distance himself or other witnesses from any physical
danger (as he would have done had he actually believed the activist had a bomb).
The officer went on to give away his criminal behavior, still on tape, despite
ongoing demands he and the other officer made that the cameras be shut off.
Alex Jones commented, “We have New York police on tape
threatening to frame someone for terrorism in a nonchalant fashion. How bad
would it have gotten if there were no cameras around? If they’ll talk like this
on camera, heaven help us.”
People are arrested every day for
joking about bombs or making other
bomb references, even if it is clearly not meant to be
serious.
This man identified himself as a police officer and
accused Rudkowski of ‘having a bomb’ and ‘being a terrorist’ to silence his free
speech for Larry Silverstein. It is a serious federal and state crime to
publicly state that someone has a bomb and is a terrorist when not true, an
extreme example of yelling fire in a theatre, and needs to be prosecuted.
Such knowingly misleading and false information is not only
malicious and immoral, but has been made
specifically illegal under the Anti-Hoax
Terrorism Act of 2003 and expanded for more stringency in
2004 and the
Terrorism Prevention Act of 2006, not to mention
long-standing protections against defamation and public endangerment. There are
also many
state and local laws
prohibiting such activity.
This man who identified himself as a police officer insisted that Rudkowski and
other members of WeAreChange.org must cease videotaping him.
Based on this video evidence alone, this officer should receive
a prison sentence and would be liable for civil damages as well– not only to
the wronged demonstrator, but by law enforcement for a dangerous waste of
resources, as cited by Ted Kennedy’s commentary regarding expansion:
“In addition,
this measure expands civil liability to allow federal
and state governments to seek reimbursement from someone who knows that
emergency personnel are responding to a hoax and fails to inform authorities
that no such event has occurred.”
Rudkowski was not only intimidated by the corrupt and criminal
officer, but his camera was confiscated. Shortly afterwards, police also
confiscated his cell phone, claiming that it was “a gun,” according to
Rudkowski.
The detective also snickered and “sang” tauntingly at Rudkowski,
“Guess who’s going to jail? Guess who’s going to jail?”
Luke was not arrested, but was detained for over an hour while
police deliberated over whether take further action.
This officer makes equal attempts to intimidate and ridicule Rudkowski.
Luke Rudkowski told the perpetrating policeman that his
statements were “slanderous,” denying ridiculous accusations that he was a
terrorist.
The officer again responded, “I saw wires. You look like a
terrorist. I don’t know what a terrorist looks like. You may be a terrorist for
all I know. You’ve made threats - now I’m concerned.”
It is obvious from the recorded video that the demonstration was
peaceful, no laws were broken and no threats were made. It is also clear that
the reason he approached the group did not regard suspicion of threatening
behavior, but to tell them that “Larry didn’t want to hear it.”
The levels of betrayal against the First Amendment of the
Constitution are so absurd and violate the basic tenants of original intent,
they can only be compared with gross violations by the enforcement officers of
the police state apparent, such as that with Abby Newman (as seen below, from
9/11: The Road to Tyranny). Egregious misinterpretation and abuse perpetrated by
the very members of society supposedly in place to guarantee our freedoms.
Abby Newman was arrested for not showing ID in August 2000 and
fell victim to an illegal vehicle search in which police found items of
subversive literature, including a “pocket Constitution.”
One officer asked the other “Is this legal?” (Case in point,
where the very society of freedom is violated by the system that regulates that
society.)
But that has become all too common in the new American police
state. A
Christian group in Philadelphia was arrested in 2004 and charged with
counts of criminal conspiracy, ethnic intimidation and riot for “praying,
singing and reading scripture during an annual ‘gay pride’ event.
Of course, the question here is not one of Christianity vs. homosexuality, but
the criminal prosecution of free speech. The eroding inherent right threatens
the freedom of Christians, homosexuals, pink-and-polka dotted people, and other
groups who were previously guaranteed protection of their voices - whether right
or wrong, embarrassing, hateful or supportive, blasphemous, sinful or true.
An
attorney in Portland, Oregon was falsely arrested under anti-terrorism
laws shortly after the 2004 Madrid bombings.
Even in Canada, where
limitations such as “reasonable” are pitted against guarantees of free
speech, people are granted ‘fundamental freedoms’ to “thought,
belief, opinion and expression.”
Yet a
protestor demonstrating outside the 2006 Bilderberg conference in
Ottawa, Don McCormick was kidnapped by an “Integrated National
Security Enforcement Team” who detained him, kicked him and psychologically
tortured him, including threats that they would “cut off his arms,” all this
after being warned not to return to the protest the previous day.
Though McCormick was accused of “trying to blow up the
Brookstreet Hotel,” just as Rudkowski was accused of being a terrorist with a
bomb, he was guilty only of holding a picket sign and being critical of the
secretive and manipulative group.
Just as McCormick’s free speech was violated, intimidated and
labeled as terroristic at the behest and for the benefit of the Bilderberg
group, Rudkowski’s speech was threatened on behalf of Larry Silverstein, who
apparently wanted to silence discuss of 9/11 and WTC Building 7 through bullying
threats.
This is not Rudkowski’s first encounter with harassment,
intimidation and denials to the rights of free speech. During a speech by
Zbigniew Brzezinski, security denied his free speech rights as a member
of the press and attempted to confiscate his video tape, despite
the fact that he declared his press position. Rudkowski serves as a free lance
reporter for
GCN Live! Radio (nationally-syndicated), and websites such as
Infowars.com and
PrisonPlanet.com, among others.
Recently the We Are Change group, which Rudkowski
founded and remains involved in, was
harassed by police outside ABC Studios during a peaceful
demonstration of support for Rosie’s public assertion of 9/11 Truth.
Free speech is no longer guaranteed under the de facto shadow
government that has hijacked the formerly legitimate government of this once
great nation. In fact, the threats are widespread - all the more so on the front
lines ‘who dare call it treason.’
Random Posts
Stumble it!
